![]() Rosengrant, D., Van Heuvelen, A., & Etkina, E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. Multimedia learning in games, simulations, and microworlds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(2), 43–58. Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Responsive teaching using simulation software: The case of orbital motion. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd Edi, pp. Multimedia learning with simulations and microworlds. PhET: Interactive simulations for teaching and learning physics. Perkins, K., Adams, W., Dubson, M., Finkelstein, N., Reid, S., Wieman, C., & LeMaster, R. ![]() ![]() On the cognitive effects of learning computer programming. Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. Washington, DC: The National Acadamies Press. Hilton (Eds.), Learning science through computer games and simulations. European Journal of Engineering Education, 40(February), 115–127. Students’ use of the interactive whiteboard during physics group work. Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics. Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: What works in the design of agent-based microworlds? Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 806–812. Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2nd ed.). Cognitive objectives in a LOGO debugging curriculum: Instruction, learning, and transfer. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Computer simulations in physics teaching and learning: A case study on students’ understanding of trajectory motion. Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O’Halloran, K. Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Vicentini (Eds.), Thinking physics for teaching (pp. Modeling software for learning and doing physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 1–17. Doing science by waving hands: Talk, symbiotic gesture, and interaction with digital content as resources in student inquiry. Gregorcic, B., Planinsic, G., & Etkina, E. A new way of using the interactive whiteboard in a high school physics classroom: A case study. Gregorcic, B., Etkina, E., & Planinsic, G. American Association of Physics Teachers. Jones (Eds.), 2014 physics education research conference proceedings (pp. Designing and investigating new ways of interactive whiteboard use in physics instruction. Algodoo: A tool for encouraging creativity in physics teaching and learning. Girwidz (Eds.), Proceedings from the 20th international conference on multimedia in physics teaching and learning (pp. Interactive whiteboards as a means of supporting students’ physical engagement and collaborative inquiry in physics. Investigating and applying advantages of interactive whiteboards in physics instruction. Exploring Kepler’s laws using an interactive whiteboard and Algodoo. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Levy (Eds.), Gesture and the dynamical dimension of language: Essays in honor of David McNeill (pp. In 2017 physics education research conference proceedings (pp. Exploring how physics students use a sandbox software to move between the physical and the formal. Millikan award lecture: Students of physics-Listeners, observers, or collaborative participants in physics scientific practices? American Journal of Physics, 83(8), 669–679.Įuler, E., & Gregorcic, B. ![]() Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age (pp. Teaching with Physlets: Examples from optics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 141–149.ĭancy, M., Christian, W., & Belloni, M. Metacomponential development in a Logo programming environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 309–318.Ĭlements, D. Effects of Logo and CAI environments on cognition and creativity. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(3), 191–206.Ĭlements, D. Multimodal transcription as academic practice: A social semiotic perspective. DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. The computer as a medium for exploring mathematics.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |